MASONIC MYTHS AND OUTRIGHT FALSEHOODS

By Nelson King, FPS, G.R.C.

Masonic myths and outright falsehoods are continually spread concerning

Freemasonry. Throughout the centuries Freemasonry has taught its valuable

lessons through allegory and symbols. The man from Galilee used parables

extensively and well. Many historians and better speakers constantly employ

anecdotes to illustrate the points they want to make. These methods

emphasize the search for truth in an interesting and factual manner.

Myths on the other hand, can be innocent or dangerous. They can be outright

lies or the perpetuation of distortions handed down through the generations.

Many of these were invented by Masonic writers and speakers to enhance the

image of Freemasonry. Some of these corruptions have caused the Craft

problems with creditable historians because they were outrageous lies.

Freemasonry, actually, requires no exaggeration to magnify its greatness.

The simple truth is all that is required to tell its story. This is the

reason for this speech is to attempt to destroy the myths that have been

prevalent, often for centuries, by telling the truth.

 

Myth: Freemasonry is a religion.

Fact: Absolutely false. This is one of several arguments employed by certain

religious fanatics in an attempt to discredit Freemasonry. They quote Albert

Pike and Henry Wilson Coil, among others, neither of whom was a man of the

cloth, to “prove” their statements. Pike was not a researcher. Most of the

hundreds of thousands of words he wrote came from his own mind, or the minds

of others whom he never mentioned but with whom he agreed. Coil wrote

millions of words about Freemasonry, and he was a lawyer and an excellent

Masonic researcher. Most of the time the words of these and other writers

are taken out of context to “prove” the thesis of the anti-Masons.

Freemasonry’s enemies conveniently ignore the thousands of Christian

ministers, and Rabbis, who prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that

Freemasonry, although religious is far from being a religion. Here are just

three of these Doctors of Divinity who have proven the critics in error:

Joseph Fort Newton, Norman Vincent Peale and Forrest D. Haggard.

 

Myth: Freemasons are satanists, because in their Lodges they do not pray to

Jesus Christ, but to a generic God such as TGAOTU or TGG or TMH.

What rubbish, Freemasonry encompasses all religions. Just because we do not

pray to one specific being does not make us satanic. If you follow their

logic that we Masons are satanist because we do not pray to Jesus then all

Canadians must be satanist because our National Anthem, which in itself is a

prayer has the line, “God keep our Land,” not Jesus keep our Land. All

Americans who sing “God Bless America” which also in itself is a prayer,

must be satanic because they do not sing Jesus Bless America, every American

who Pledges Allegiance to The Flag, “One Country under God” not One Country

under Jesus, must also be a satanist. Why even all Englishmen, must be

satanic because they sing “God Save the Queen,” not Jesus save the Queen.

Anyone who has been a witness in court and who has sworn to tell the truth

the whole truth and nothing but the truth, “So help me God” must also be

satanic, because they do not say So help me Jesus. To say we Masons are

satanic is pure rubbish.

 

Myth: Freemasonry is a secret society.

Fact: Unequivocally false. This is widely stated and believed, even by

Freemasons. Many Masons believe this so strongly they won’t even talk to

their wives and families about the Craft. Many writers of yesteryear helped

promote this error. Our ritualists have added to the belief. The critics of

Freemasonry want the world to believe in this secrecy because they have

little else on which to stand. Yet by no stretch of the imagination can

Masonry be termed a secret organization. If it was, no outsiders would even

know it exists. Anything that is known is not secret. Without question there

are many secret organizations throughout the world, but only men and women

within those circles are familiar with them. Most, if not all, ritualistic

religions have conclaves (literally: rooms locked with a key from

outsiders). Should these be condemned along with Freemasonry? Secret means:

“Kept from general knowledge or view; kept hidden; operating in a

clandestine manner”; and on and on. Secret groups meet in places known only

to the few. Freemasons meet in places clearly marked for the public to see.

Secret outfits never record anything that might become public property. All

Masonic functions are fully recorded, proceedings can be read by the general

public, thousands of books have been written and published about

Freemasonry, millions of words about the Craft come off printing presses

every year.

 

Members of secret organizations never advertise their affiliation;

Freemasons proudly wear the Square and Compasses and other emblems. The

complete Emulation Ritual [which is what our Work is based on can be found

in the Scarborough Public Library. Just get the book “Unlocked Secrets”, why

it even has pictures of a BBC TV broadcast in 1967 which showed all of the

three Craft Degrees So let us dispel the myth that Freemasonry is a “secret

Organization.” It isn’t. It never has been.

 

How many here were given or have a ” Masonic Bible”. Show of hands.

Well this is a myth. There is not such thing as an Masonic Bible. The Bibles

sometimes called “Masonic Bibles” are just Bibles (usually the King James

Version) to which a concordance, giving the Biblical citations on which the

Masonic Ritual is based, has been added. Sometimes reference material on

Masonic history is included.

 

Myth. The story of Hiram as we portray it in our Lodges is based on truth.

Fact. It isn’t. It has been called an “allegory,” but factually it isn’t. An

allegory is a story within a story. What we portray is actually a fable. But

it’s a fable that teaches valuable and unforgettable lessons. The Temple

Solomon had built to the glory of God was a fact.

 

The story as told in the third, or Master Masons degree, is not meant to be

factual. In a broad sense it can be called a legend. The “Hiramic Legend” is

an important part of the teachings graphically imprinted on the mind of the

candidate. Allen Roberts said, The lessons found in the Legend of Hiram Abif

reach to the roots of the soul and spirit. They are instilled in the heart

forever. You were an active participant, so that these lessons would be

deeply implanted, never to be lost….The ultimate triumph of good over

evil, and life over death, has been depicted throughout the ages in drama,

song and story. Legends depicting a central figure being killed and then

returned to life were common to many religions and rites. These undoubtedly

had a bearing on the development of the lessons the ritualists of

Freemasonry believed had to be taught. But the Hiramic Legend is more

intense, moralistic, and meaningful than any that preceded it.

“Hiram Abif did exist. He was a skillful worker in brass and other metals.

He was sent to assist King Solomon…. [But] the Hiram Abif who actually

worked at beautifying the Temple of Solomon lived to an old age! He died of

natural causes!”

 

Myth. Pythagoras was Raised to the Sublime Degree of Master Mason.

Fact. So say the ritualists of yesteryear, and their successors have

compounded the fabrication. Pythagoras was indeed a great man. Although he

left behind no writings of his own, his students did. His influence has

extended to the present day. It is little wonder his teachings have reached

into Freemasonry, even if only fragmentarily. But, even if a form of

Freemasonry was known while he lived (582-507 B.C.), he could not have been

made a Master Mason. This degree wasn’t invented (or had it evolved) until

the late 1720’s. Actually there are those who believe that the Freemasonry

that did mature into what we have today was influenced by the Pythagoreans.

 

Myth: Much of our Masonic ritual was written by William Shakespeare.

Fact: There is no evidence to indicate Shakespeare even knew there was an

organization of stone masons that would eventually become Speculative

Freemasonry. The old Gothic Constitutions are the basis for The

Constitutions of the Free-Masons compiled by Dr. James Anderson in 1722 and

adopted in 1723. There is nothing in the Gothic tomes that remotely

resembles the writing of the Bard. Many of Shakespeare’s phrases have found

their way into the rituals of the Craft, but they certainly were not written

especially for this purpose. It would be nice to claim William as an early

accepted member, but we can’t. Let’s stop trying.

 

Myth: All, or most, of the Freemasons in Germany were murdered during the

Nazi regime.

Fact: The truth about the horrors of Nazism will never be known. The number

of German Freemasons sent to concentration camps, the gas chambers, prisons,

tortured or murdered in their homes will never be known. Unscientific

research, the only kind possible in this case, seem to indicate that about

two-thirds of the then 85,000 Masons in Germany were injured in some manner,

this left one-third untouched. The number actually murdered or tortured is

open to conjecture. It must be remembered that the Nazi horror reached into

other countries and the Freemasons in them.

We do know without question that Freemasonry is the first organization

proscribed by dictators. An organization that believes in and teaches the

Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God, that believes in the search

for truth, cannot be allowed to exist under a dictatorship.

 

Myth: Adolf Hitler hated and feared Freemasonry.

Fact: Not exactly. Oral histories (or accounts) can easily be fabricated,

this is especially true when publication comes after the subject’s death.

With this in mind I will tell you of such conversation recorded from

Gesprache Mit Hitler was reported to say. “Freemasonry has always been

harmless in Germany.” It “achieves the fruition of fantasy through the use

of symbols, rites and magic influence of emblems of worship. Herein lies the

great danger which I have taken in hand. Don’t you see that our party must

be something very similar, and order, an hierarchic organization of secular

priesthood? This naturally means that something similar opposing us may not

exist. It is either us, the Freemasons or the Church but never two side by

side. The Catholic Church has made its position clear, at least in regard to

the Freemasons. Now we are the strongest and, there, we shall eliminate both

the Church and the Freemasons.”

 

Myth: Freemasonry did not operate during World War II in the countries

controlled by the Nazis.

Fact: It did, but not openly. (Even today there are countries in which

Freemasons must meet in secret.) In the infamous Buchenwald concentration

camp the Masonic population reached close to 100 in October 1944, According

to M. Jattefaux, a French Freemason, the known Masons met daily. By

occupying the minds of these men with Masonic ritual and lessons helped

relief them of their anxieties. Masonic subjects were selected and by word

of mouth transmitted from one prison block to the next prison block. There

quiet discussions would take place. Then block by block the results of their

debate returned.

 

Our American Brothers have been saddled with many myths. Such as.

Myth: Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry were Freemasons.

Fact: Neither Thomas Jefferson or Patrick Henry were members of the Craft.

An exhaustive search of Masonic records in Virginia, and elsewhere, offers

no iota of evidence to make them Freemasons. Jefferson participated in the

cornerstone laying of his University at Charlottesville, which was done

Masonically. He praised Freemasonry and his own words proved he had never

been a member of the Craft.

 

Myth: All of George Washington’s generals during the War for American

Independence were Masons.

Fact: Thirty-three of the generals serving under Washington were members of

the Craft, a long way from “all.” The late James R. Case and Ronald E.

Heaton made comprehensive studies of the Revolutionary period and debunked

many of the claims considered here.

 

Myth: Washington insisted that the Marquis de Lafayette be made a Mason

before he would promote him to general, and the same claim has been made

about the Baron von Steuben.

Fact: Both Lafayette and von Steuben were Freemasons before they arrived to

help fight the British. This was true of Lafayette even though he wasn’t 21

years of age when he arrived in America. It’s highly likely that Washington

never did know they were Masons. The stories of both of these men are highly

interesting, but space prohibits the telling of them here.

 

Myth: The Boston Tea Party was organized in St. Andrew’s Lodge in Boston and

its member participated in tossing the tea into Boston Harbor.

Fact: So well has the secrecy surrounding the Boston Tea Party been kept

that to this day not a single participant can be truthfully named! It’s true

that St. Andrew’s Lodge didn’t meet on the night of the “party.” This proves

nothing. The “T” that has been claimed is part of the minutes of the Lodge

is actually an indistinguishable scroll. By no stretch of the imagination

can it be called a “T” or any other letter.

 

Myth: There is no such thing as a woman Freemason:

Fact, Femine Freemasonry and Co-Masonry do exist, in fact there are many

many Feminine Grand Lodges, the largest concentration of women masons is in

England with some 60,000 members.  Just because mainstream Grand Lodges do not recognize them does not mean that they do not exist.

 

Myth: Prince Hall Grand Lodges only accept Christian, black men as members.

Fact: All 44 Prince Hall Grand Lodges accept men of all faiths and color. In

fact at one time there were Prince Hall Lodges composed of mainly white

Jewish members. Prince Hall Grand Lodges use what we would call the American

Ritual, either Duncan’s or Webb’s, which is very similar to what the two St.

Johns Lodges of London use. By June of 1996 the only two Canadian Grand

Lodges not extending full recognition to Prince Hall, will be the Grand

Lodge of Alberta, and the Grand Lodge of Canada in the Province of Ontario.

 

Myth: Pope Clement XII condemned Freemasonry in 1738.

Fact. THE POPE DIDN’T DO IT There are many sources to prove Clement XII was

not mentally or physically able to preside over his religious kingdom. What

follows is based on information from several of these sources, particularly

Papes, Rois, Franc-Macons: L’histoire de la franc-maconnerie des origines a

nos jours (Popes, Kings, Freemasons: The History of Freemasonry from its

origins to the present) by Charles V. Boker, 1977. For the whole term of his

papacy, Pope Clement XII was blind and sick. He didn’t sign the Bull

condemning Freemasonry that bore his name. His church has been living under

false assumptions as far as it concerns this organization of friends and

brothers. Clement, 78 when he assumed the papal throne on July 30, 1730,

shortly after became seriously ill. His health continued to rapidly

deteriorated. Within two years after assuming the papal throne he became

completely blind. His hand had to be guided to the place where his signature

was required on documents. The pope reportedly said, when he heard about

something his nephew and others did that made him unhappy: “Well, let them

do as they wish, since they are the bosses anyway.” The suffering of the

pope was graphically described by Boker, whose information from many

authentic sources was carefully documented. Clement’s gout was particularly

severe causing him to practically lose his memory. Until his death he was,

without question, senile. But it served the purposes of those surrounding

him to keep him on the throne.

 

With the continual deterioration of Pope Clement, Cardinal Nero Corsini ran

the Holy See with tyrannical power. It was he who called together his

cohorts to produce the condemnation of Freemasonry. Among these conspirators

was the Chief Inquisitor of Florence. The dastardly deed was done on June

25, 1738. Boker proves that none of these participants were theologians;

none were knowledgeable about what they were asked to rubber stamp. “You

don’t have to be very clever to see that a man who had been completely blind

for six years, who had taken no part in Church business for even longer, who

had been suffering from senile debility for two years, could not have been

the one who drew up the Bull,” writes Boker. “The fact is, he didn’t even

sign the Bull that was proclaimed in his name.” In an accompanying photo

copy of the document only one name appears. And it’s written in the

calligraphic style of the balance of the document! Not a single name of

those taking part in the atrocity appears anywhere on it! Freemasonry, if

Pope Clement knew anything about it, was never condemned by him.

In my opinion and I stress that this is only my opinion, the reason the

Catholic Church banned Freemasonry was because there was a power struggle in

Church between the Jesuits and those who were the rulers of the Holy See.

The Jesuits who as we all know where and are the intelligencia of the Church

were and in some cases still are Freemasons. For example Freemasonry was

brought to Costa Rica by the Jesuits. Some 25 years ago when cleaning out

the Basilica in San Jose, a Bishops Miter was found and given the Grand

Lodge of Costa Rica. So what, well this Miter is adorned on the front with

an embroidery of the 18th degree Rose Croix, the piligan pecking at her

breast to feed her young. Yes this is a Christian symbol, however on the

tails of the Miter is embroidered the Square and Compasses. But I digress.

Lodges were formed and held in the Vatican. Because they met in secret,

Cardinal Nero Corsini was afraid that the Jesuits might take over the Holy

See. Again, can I prove it. No. But it makes an interesting story.

 

My Brethren the hour grows late, but there are many, many more myths but

these will have to keep for an other time. Thank you for your attention and

thank you for once again inviting me to address you. Thank you.

Author’s Note– My thanks to Allen E. Roberts, and Wallace E. McLeod for

allowing me to use some of their material in this speech.